This material appears in sections 6.1 and 6.2.
or else there is no such triangle. If the three angles do add up to
then there are infinitely many triangles with those three angles.
Three angles does not determine a triangle, because you can rescale the three sides by the same factor without changing the angles.
For instance there is a triange with angles
,
,
whose side lengths are
,
,
, but there is also one with side lengths
,
,
, or
,
,
, etc.
, and no triangles if the two angles add up to greater than
.
If you know two of the angles then you can find the third, since the three angles should add up to
. Then you can use the Law of Sines to find the other two side lengths.
Suppose, for example, that you know
,
,
.
Then, since
, we also know that
. From the Law of Sines:
so
Similarly,
so
.
If you know two of the angles then you can find the third, since the three angles should add up to
. Then you can use the Law of Sines to find the other two side lengths, just like the SAA case.
, and sides
and
.
Don't try to memorize all of the following cases, try to visualize what's happening in each case.
Imagine you are trying to make a triangle out of sticks. You know how long sticks
and
are.
We don't know how long the third stick should be, but we can imagine that it will lie flat on the ground.
We know that stick
should come out of the ground at angle
. We don't know what the angle between sides
and
should be, so imagine they are connected by a hinge.
We want to know how we can set this up so that the other end of stick
touches the ground.
Draw side
coming out of the ground at angle
. Draw of circle of radius
centered at the end of side
. Side
must have one endpoint at the center of this circle and the other endpoint a a point where the circle intersects side
.
For any triangle we find the procedure will be the same. We know sides
and
and angle
, so use the Law of Sines to find angle
.
so
There are two possible solutions for
, either
or
. To figure out which one to use you must look at your picture.
is an acute angle, while,
is an obtuse angle, so pick the one which maches the picture.
Now we know
and
, so
, and finally we can use the Law of Sines to find
so
is acute
.

does not reach the ground, so the triangle can't close up.

can reach the ground in exactly one spot.
In this case we get a right triangle,
.

can reach the ground in two spots.
In this triangle
is an acute angle, so use
In this triangle
is obtuse, so use

can reach the ground in two spots, but one of them doesn't correspond to a triangle with angle
.
There is only one triangle to consider, and
is acute, so use
.

doesn't reach the ground on the correct side of side
.

can reach the ground in two spots, but one of them doesn't correspond to a triangle with angle
.
In this triangle
is an acute angle, so use
.
Let's suppose, for example, that we know
,
and
Connect the two open ends to make a triangle.
Now use the Law of Cosines to find side
.
so
Now we have all three sides, so see SSS.
Given three side lengths that satisfy the triangle inequality you can find the three angles by using the three versions of the Law of Cosines.
Suppose we have side lengths
,
, and
.
There is a triangle with these three side lengths, since
is the longest side and
.
You could show this with a sketch by drawing a segment of length 15 for he longest side. Then draw circles centered at each edge of the segment with radii equal to
and
and see that the two circles intersect.
The point where they intersect is the third vertex of the triangle:
So we have a triangle
One method would be to use the Law of Cosines three times to find the three angles. To find angle $C$:
so
Similarly:
You could have also used the Law of Cosines twice and then subtracted the two agles form
to get the third.
Another method would be to use the Law of Cosines once and then use the Law of Sines twice to find the other two angles, or use the Law of Sines once and then subtract the two angles from
to get the third.
When using the Law of Sines you must be careful to consider whether you need
or
.
You can avoid this problem by always doing the Law of Cosines in the first step to find the largest angle. Then the other two angles must be acute, so you only need to take
in you solutions.
For example, if you found
with the Law of Cosines then you could ust the Law of Sines to find:
and
But if you found
with the Law of Cosines then you need:
and
Author: Christopher Cashen <nil >
Date: 2008/11/28 11:49:59