This material appears in sections 1.8-1.9.
For the first three, +, -, ⋅ the domain is the intersection of the domain of
and
. That is, the only restriction on the domain is that both
and
must be defined.
For division we must in addition restrict to
such that
.
For example, let
and
.
The domain of
is
. The domain of
is
.
The intersection of these is
.
The domain of
,
and
would all be
.
For
we must also insist that the denominator is not zero, so we can not have
.
The domain of
is
.
In the previous example we were able to write out
as
and it is clear from this expression what the domain should be.
In general we must be careful that both
and
are defined. This fact can be obscured when writing out the expression for the combination.
For example, if
and
then the domain of
is all reals, and the domain of
is
.
What about the domain of
? For both
and
to be defined we need to take the intersection of their domains, which is
.
If we write out
We might be tempeted to simplify this and say
, but this would be misleading because then it would appear that the domain is all reals.
The domain is not all reals, it is all non-zero reals, so we should say:
To find the domain of
consider what it would take for
to make sense.
needs to be defined, or we can't do the first step. But then we want to apply
to the output of
, so we need to know that
is in the domain of
.
Let
and let
. The domain of
is
.
The domain of
is also
.
To find the domain of
we know that we need
for
to be defined, but in addition we need that
is in the domain of
, so
Therefore, the domain of
is
.
Note that if you just tried to write out the expression for
it is clear that we need
, but it's not so clear that we also need
.
What if we do the composition in the other order,
? Check that the domain of
is
.
Here is an even more basic illustration of this issue. Let
.
The domain of
is
. The range of
is also
.
So if we compose
with itself the domain of
is
.
However, if we write out
we may be tempted to simplify this expression to:
Be careful though, this expression makes it appear that the domain is all reals, but
is not defined for
.
If we wish to simplify we must write:
Author: Christopher Cashen <nil >
Date: 2008/09/23 10:50:10