Using analyticity to check the consistency of experimental measurements. by David Eyre and Graeme Milton Department of Mathematics, University of Utah INSCC 110, 3:30pm Monday, March 29, 1999 Abstract This is joint work with Joe Mantese and Roderic Lakes. Experimental measurements often give the real and imaginary parts of the complex dielectric constant or magnetic permeability (or the bulk and shear moduli of viscoelastic materials) as a function of frequency. It is well known that the real and imaginary parts are Hilbert transforms of each other, with respect to frequency. These relations, known as the Kramers-Kronig dispersion relations, have a long history dating back to 1926 and have proved to be an invaluable tool for interpreting data. Such dispersion relations are prevalent throughout physics and derive from the causal nature of the response of materials, bodies or particles to electromagnetic, elastic or other fields. In actual experiments one only makes measurements over a finite range of frequencies. This corresponds to the following mathematical problem: suppose we know the imaginary part of an analytic function is positive in the upper half plane, and is known along two disjoint intervals along the real axis. What can one say about the real part of the function? Our incomplete knowledge of the imaginary part of the function means that we can only derive inequalities on the real part. These inequalities generalize the Kramers-Kronig relations, providing bounds on the combinations of data values that are permissible over the measured frequency interval. They can provide highly accurate interpolation formulas for the real part, given its value at a few selected frequencies and given the imaginary part over a range of frequencies. We illustrate the practical utility of the bounds as applied to high frequency transmission line measurements of the complex relative magnetic permeability of a composite made with equal parts (by volume) of barium titanate and a magnesium-copper-zinc ferrite. For viscoelasticity we obtain even tighter bounds by assuming the complex bulk and shear moduli derive from a relaxation model. For more information see: http://www.math.utah.edu/~eyre/research/kk/node1.html